Are you counting the Omer?

Monday, May 30, 2011

"Dove" the Destroyer

In the James Bond movie "For Your Eyes Only", the character named KRISTatos 
informs the viewer:
 
Milos Columbo. His name came up in connection with a smuggling operation last 
year.  That's the least of his offenses. Drugs, white slavery, contract murder.  In 
the Greek underworld, he is known as "the Dove."  A very sick joke.

Leaving behind the murky world of fiction, where everything is "based on a true 
story", we venture into the supposedly liberating world of history, where fact is 
often concealed.  We turn our attention to a man whose name means "Dove", as if 
some kind of "sick joke":  Titus the Destroyer, known officially as Titus Flavius 
Caesar Vespasianus Augustus, well-known to anyone who has read Flavius 
Josephus' "The Wars of the Jews".  This is "the son" of the 
General-turned-Emperor Vespasian.  Commissioned by his father to carry on 
the Roman war in Galilee and Judaean and to lay siege to Jerusalem, "Hawk" 
would have been a far better name for the man.

Where do we learn that Titus means "Dove"?  On page 130 of 
"Our Italian Surnames", by Joseph Guerin Fucilla, we find that "[t]he Romans 
enjoyed conferring bird names upon their fellow men such as Titus, dove
Gaius, magpie, Gallus, rooster..." etc.  (There was a Cestius Gallus, a Roman 
General that Vespasian replaced, a contemporary of the resistance leader 
Simon, making us wonder if this is the cock that crowed three times when Simon 
Peter denied "Jesus".)

Given what we now know about the name "Titus", we can make some sense out 
of the scene of the baptism of "Jesus" by "John", where "the Spirit" descends "in 
the form of" or "like" a dove.  The authors of the Christian "Gospels" or "Good 
News" accounts are informing us that "Jesus the Savior" is none other than "Titus 
the Destroyer".  (Inversion is the simplest of methods of hiding the truth.)  The 
Roman Flavian family (consisting of Vespasian, Titus and Domitian), who reigned 
as Roman Emperor until the end of the "First Century" are sharing an inside joke 
with the Roman elites about how they were able to con some of the Jews into 
worshiping the Emperor, a mere man, as Diius ("God").

The connection in the Christian scriptures doesn't end there.  The Hebrew word 
for "dove" is יונה "Jonah".  With this in hand, we can no make better sense out of 
another "Jesus saying" that is typically interpreting in an altogether different 
fashion than what we will arrive at, "There shall be no sign given ... but the sign of 
Jonas the prophet."  Note that while the other 3 Gospel narratives associate this 
answer to a request for a sign from heaven with the "signs of the times", namely 
the impending destruction of Jerusalem, the Gospel of Mark makes no mention 
of Jonas.  This actually supports my theory that the Gospel of Mark is indeed the  
Priority text (i.e., the first of the canonical Gospels), as scholarly consensus goes, 
and that it was probably authored by Vespasian (Marcus Aurelius-style, meaning 
"on the battlefield", as the later Aurelius is supposed to have done with his Stoic 
philosophical work "Meditations") or one of his people, since it makes no mention 
of his son "Jonas".
 
So what was this sign of Jonas the prophet?  Well, we know that the prophet Jonah 
went to non-Jewish Nineveh to warn it that it would be destroyed if it didn't repent. 
The inversion of this is a non-Jewish Titus going to a Jewish Jerusalem to warn it 
about the destruction which he would carry out if it didn't follow his orders.  Titus 
the Destroyer was the "Second Coming" of "Jesus", the literary gloss of a Dovish 
Messiah that was retrofitted to recent Jewish history.  As with the expectations 
concerning "Jesus" at his "Second Coming" that are often held by fundamentalist 
Christians, Titus played the role of Conqueror, Destroyer and Judge.
 
Much more can be said on this and related subjects and I hope to do so at a later 
date.  I owe mountains of credit to the work of Robert Eisenman, Joseph Atwill 
and Cliff Carrington (and to a lesser degree, Barbara Thiering), without whom I 
may not have been able to make these and other important connections.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.